Alternatives toFirebase

Firebase is not a single backend product. A typical Firebase application may depend on Firestore or Realtime Database, Authentication, Cloud Functions, file storage, hosting, push notifications and several smaller services. That makes choosing a Firebase alternative less like replacing one SaaS subscription and more like deciding which parts of the application stack should stay together. European infrastructure is already possible for parts of Firebase. Firestore, storage and serverless resources can be deployed in European regions, so moving away from Firebase is not automatically a question of moving application data from the United States to Europe. The distinction becomes more useful when provider jurisdiction, service-specific data locations, architecture and operational control also matter. Developers comparing European Firebase alternatives should first identify what they actually need to replace. One project may mainly need a managed database and authentication. Another depends heavily on realtime updates, serverless functions, object storage and mobile SDKs. Teams may also be looking for a relational database instead of Firestore's document model, an open-source backend, self-hosting, easier portability or more direct control over the infrastructure underneath their application. The European backend platforms listed below approach those requirements in different ways. Use them as a starting point for comparing Firebase competitors by database model, authentication, realtime capabilities, storage, functions, deployment options, provider location and disclosed hosting information. A good Firebase replacement is not necessarily the platform with the longest feature list. It is the one whose architecture matches the parts of Firebase your application actually depends on.

• European provider identity
• Hosting location visibility
• DPA and trust details